It’s anti-feminine to tell women that they MUST be financially independent before they get married.

But teaching women to be self sufficient, less greedy & more patient is feminine.

Women who encourage this have ulterior motives.

Major of it, is that they can disrespect men
& ask for a divorce whenever they like.

The more women become financially independent, without allowing a man play that vital role in their lives, the more masculine they’ll become.

And when a woman starts exhibiting masculine traits, she starts to feel the need to compete with a man.

Men and women can compete in the public.

I mean, outside a matrimonial setting.

But that can never be acceptable in a matrimonial setting.

Where it exists, there lies a dysfunctional home.

We need to stop teaching women that they can not attain their womanhood without having money.

God created women to be taken care of.

The people who are allowed to take care of women are her parents, brothers and sisters, relatives and her HUSBAND.

That’s how it should be.

So if a man finds a woman that is already making money or financially
independent, glory be to God for him.

Only if he is wise enough to lead a woman that is financially independent.

But a man that sees that as a major criteria, is a man that doesn’t know women.

Or just a lazy and entitled man.

What we should be teaching women is to be graceful & grateful.

And that they should be patient.

Women should not be discouraged from going into relationships if they’re not financially independent.

Because what you’re saying in emphasis is that, men should not go into relationship until they’re financially independent.

as marriage is concerned, money is important.

But it’s not as important in relationships.

Especially, if we are to encourage young people to find their spouses when they’re young and broke.

And before that man or woman becomes financially independent, they have learnt to stay with each other without money.

You don’t set women up on a survival mode.

Where they’re pressured to do anything for money, just so they can look “independent” to attract a man; you’ll increase prostitution, more independent women & less feminine women.

There are lots of wives and mothers that have decided to sacrifice their careers just to be stay at home wives for sometime.

If they can no longer contribute financially to the home, does it now make them a liability?

Should their husbands love & treat them any less?

Should they no longer eat or look beautiful?

We need to stop this disingenuous narrative.

It’s good for a woman not to be idle.

But teaching men to use financial independence as a criteria to choosing them is wrong.

And any woman that’s supporting this is deceiving you.

What she can do as a woman,you can’t.

And if they pay you as a man to do them, you won’t last long.

Find a woman that’s contented & respectful, to marry.

If she has her money, be sure it’s not more than yours.

Take care of her with your earnings.

And pray you can rely on her, in your time of needs.

End.