The problem with opt-in polling is that it is notoriously unreliable for young people and other groups (notably Hispanics), often producing results that are wildly at variance with traditional polling. These polls tend to produce “bogus” respondents, who simply answer questions arbitrarily and quickly in order to collect the rewards that are offered for participating in the survey. As an example, one opt-in survey seemed to show that 12 percent of adults under 30 and 24 percent of Hispanics claim they have a license to operate a nuclear submarine (in reality, the number of people who have this license is very close to 0 percent).

In the case of Holocaust denial, Pew conducted its own survey using where participants were “recruited by mail—rather than online—using probability-based sampling.” The results: “Rather than 20%, we found that 3% of adults under 30 agree with the statement ‘The Holocaust is a myth.’ (This percentage is the same for every other age group as well.)” In other words, only a very small minority of young Americans are Holocaust deniers—and there has been no growth of Holocaust denial among the young compared to earlier generations. The entire Economist report was a fabrication. (To its credit, The Economist updated its story with an acknowledgement of Pew’s critique, although the magazine fell short of the complete disavowal of the original article it should have offered).

On May 31, the San Francisco Chronicle published a debunking of the Harvard/Harris poll that built on the Pew critique. Aside from the already noted problems with opt-in sampling, the newspaper noted:

Respondents in online opt-in panels are particularly prone to speed through survey questions rather than reading carefully and generating thoughtful answers. About 1 in 5 of Harvard-Harris’ respondents, and half of its 18-to-24-year-old sample, completed the survey’s more than 200 complex questions, some over 50 words in length, in under 15 minutes. On average, respondents answered each question in about four seconds—much faster than the rate at which adults read nonfiction texts.

We can therefore conclude that the participants of the Harvard/Harris poll probably weren’t reading the questions with care, and were often just racing to finish the exercise.

Yet these polls were notable not only for their fraudulent results but also for the extreme credulity with which they were treated by respectable politicians and pontificators.

Former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg tweeted, “79 years after Auschwitz-Birkenau was liberated, a poll found that 1 in 5 young Americans believe the Holocaust is a myth – & half think it may be.” Representative Dean Phillips echoed this thought. Atlantic writer Conor Friedersdorf tweeted, “WTF 18 to 29 year olds? When you add ‘neither agree nor disagree’ that’s fully *half* that fails to reject the despicable and idiotic claim that *the Holocaust is a myth.*” None of these avatars of establishment wisdom bothered to ask themselves if it is even plausible that roughly half of young adults in America would in fact be open Holocaust deniers.

Similarly with the Harris/Harvard poll, simpleminded gullibility was on ample display. The poll show that 67 percent of Americans age 18–24 believe that Jews as a class are “oppressors.” William Saletan of The Bulwark, an organ of Never Trump conservatism, claimed that the poll’s finding was “consistent with other polls that have found relatively high anti-Jewish sentiment among young American adults.” Cathy Young, a libertarian who also writes for The Bulwark, responded to this poll by writing, “Yeah, next time someone tells me that I need to stop being a grumpy old person and cheer for the wonderfulness of the social-justiced ‘kids,’ I’ll just point to this and say no, fuck the little shits.”

Liberal pundit Michael A. Cohen (who likes to remind the world he is not, despite his name, the former lawyer for Donald Trump), chimed in by saying, “The Harris poll is generally not good … but this is a terrifying result … and I imagine is directly related to dipshits who keep accusing Israel of genocide.” With the liberal Michael Cohen writing tweets this ridiculous (there are many others of the same caliber), perhaps the felon Michael Cohen should be the one trying to distinguish his good name from his embarrassing doppelgänger.

The comments by Young and Cohen are especially revealing. While some promoting the junk polls are silent on the Gaza slaughter, others are enthusiastic advocates for Israeli militarism. Such writers and politicians are well aware that what Israel is doing to the Palestinians is indefensible. So they eagerly embrace any argument they can to discredit the young people who are leading a mass movement on behalf of Palestinian rights. If the weapon to hand is dishonest polling that smears the younger generation as Hamas-loving Holocaust deniers, then that is the blunt instrument they will use.

Pollster Evan Roth Smith of Blueprint, an outfit that provides opinion data to Democrats, distilled recent findings by saying, “Young voters do not look at our politics and see any good guys. They see a dying empire led by bad people.” As my colleague Chris Lehmann noted, young people think this way because they are paying attention. One could add that the people who are the mouthpieces of the dying empire are becoming ever more stridently dishonest.